0
0
0
Heart of Missouri MFA AgriServices - CLICK - MFA CONNECT  
- DTN Headline News
Managing Fertilizers' High Prices
By Russ Quinn
Thursday, March 26, 2026 4:54AM CDT

OMAHA (DTN) -- Fertilizer prices are on the rise. They were already fairly high to begin with, and the military conflict between the United States and Iran has made these nutrients even more expensive.

Farmers often ask if they can delay their phosphorus (P) and potash (K) applications until the next year, when prices might be lower. The quick answer is yes -- if their soil test levels are near recommended levels, according to University of Missouri Extension state nutrient management specialist John Lory in a news release.

Lory likens a soil test to the gas gauge of a car. A soil test at or above recommended levels is much like a gas gauge reading full.

"If your gas tank is full, you know you can travel 500 miles before the tank runs dry," Lory said. "If you are making a trip that is 200 miles, you can, with confidence, make that trip once without refilling your tank."

The second trip is likely OK as well. But you know you need to refuel before completing the third trip, he said.

On most Missouri fields, optimum soil test levels mean you should be fine skipping one year without refilling the tank, he explained.

Many farmers already apply P and K on alternate years, Lory said.

But what if you did not apply last year? Can you take another year off? According to the University of Missouri Extension's recommendations, one more year should not be a problem, he said.

Lory suggested several options to reduce fertilizer costs this year. They include:

-- Do not apply fertilizer to fields that are at or above optimum soil test levels. Extensive research shows that soils at optimum soil test levels do not see increases in yield from the fertilizer applied that year. A benefit of following soil tests is you have the flexibility to skip a year of application if needed. Why not take advantage of this benefit in a year when P and K prices are high?

-- Not comfortable with going to zero? A second option is to cut the fertilizer rate by 50% or less of removal rate. Most yield response to fertilizer is driven by the first 30% to 50% of the fertilizer applied. If you are nervous about going to zero, going halfway will likely provide 100% of the yield benefit this year, even on low-testing soils.

-- The most conservative option is to limit the fertilizer rate to removal rate. In a year of high fertilizer prices, there is no reason to apply more than the crop removal rate.

"If your field happens to be responsive to added P and K this year -- a big if! -- crop removal rate is guaranteed to maximize yield," he said.

In some cases, however, soil test recommendations don't fully identify fertilizer needs.

Lory said he has seen potash deficiency symptoms associated with highly compacted areas of the field, because restricted root growth prevents the plant from getting to the potash in the soil. Cool soils also can temporarily limit the availability of phosphorus.

"Often these conditions lead to transient deficiency symptoms that the plant grows out of as soils warm and become less saturated," he said.

In addition, sandy soils and soils with low organic matter may not have the same capacity to withstand multiple years with no fertilizer application. Using the gas tank analogy, these soils have a smaller gas tank.

Lory said fertilizers help sustain crop production on agricultural soils. Soil testing helps farmers understand the nutrient status of soils.

"When fertilizer prices are high, we can also use soil testing to understand the risks of not applying fertilizer," he said.

To read the entire release, visit https://extension.missouri.edu/….

Russ Quinn can be reached at russ.quinn@dtn.com

Follow him on social platform X @RussQuinnDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, March 23, 2026 12:53PM CDT
Monday, March 23, 2026 12:53PM CDT
Wednesday, January 28, 2026 12:33PM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Tuesday, March 24, 2026 9:13AM CDT
Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:28AM CDT
Thursday, March 12, 2026 11:28AM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Thursday, March 26, 2026 7:08AM CDT
Wednesday, March 25, 2026 4:34AM CDT
Wednesday, March 25, 2026 4:34AM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Wednesday, January 28, 2026 7:05AM CDT
Tuesday, December 23, 2025 10:35AM CDT
Tuesday, October 21, 2025 12:48PM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Thursday, March 26, 2026 10:03AM CDT
Wednesday, March 25, 2026 9:01AM CDT
Wednesday, March 25, 2026 9:01AM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Tuesday, March 17, 2026 2:21PM CDT
Thursday, March 12, 2026 2:09PM CDT
Thursday, March 5, 2026 12:21PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, March 23, 2026 5:55PM CDT
Monday, March 23, 2026 5:55PM CDT
Monday, March 16, 2026 4:07PM CDT
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Friday, February 27, 2026 11:03AM CDT
Friday, February 13, 2026 1:54PM CDT
Friday, February 6, 2026 11:01AM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Monday, March 16, 2026 9:27AM CDT
Monday, March 16, 2026 9:27AM CDT
Wednesday, March 11, 2026 2:46PM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Monday, January 19, 2026 1:10PM CDT
Friday, November 14, 2025 8:44AM CDT
Thursday, October 9, 2025 6:32AM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Tuesday, March 24, 2026 11:12AM CDT
Thursday, March 19, 2026 1:23PM CDT
Wednesday, March 11, 2026 12:27PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Friday, March 20, 2026 6:04AM CDT
Tuesday, March 17, 2026 4:59AM CDT
Monday, February 9, 2026 2:22PM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN